Quote:In the short space of two years, 50,000 buildings had been hurriedly built in Pyongyang in time for the World Youth Celebrations of 1989. The tragic consequences of this superhuman effort was that construction absolutely ceased in every province of North Korea after these two years.
The small remaining amounts of cement, steel and timber were gathered and reserved solely for the regime’s first priority: military infastructure such as power plants and strategic installations. Even when the regime’s own elite demanded the construction of personal apartments, the only way forward was to agree on an otherwise unthinkable 70/30 split in ownership with the private sector. The regime’s elite provided land and manpower, while the private sector brought in construction materials from China.
The new and expensive buildings were shared out or sold among Party officials and the mercantile elite; no other Pyongyang resident could dream of moving into these newly constructed apartments. When the Party elite sensed the situation might escalate into violence, the Pyongyang City Council allowed underground dwellings, although it technically broke wartime regulations.
The number of underground dwellings grew explosively – especially during the freezing temperatures of North Korean wintertime – and competition for underground space became fierce. The Pyongyang City Council decided in the end to officially issue licenses for underground living. According to the Wartime Evacuation Planning Committee study of 2002, the number of households with an underground dwelling license was 150,000.
http://newfocusintl.com/north-koreas-of ... -parts-12/
Mabool wrote:The famine was a relatively short part of the timespan since 1989, so no. Famines also don't change shit about the fact that the DPRK should be trying to achieve some sort of growth, which implies moving people from tiny huts in shithole villages into modern apartment buildings.
somewhat wrote:while also being the world's largest importer of Hennessy cognac. .
Kirov wrote:
Do you have a source on this? I'm pretty interested.
Quote:The famine was a relatively short part of the timespan since 1989, so no. Famines also don't change shit about the fact that the DPRK should be trying to achieve some sort of growth, which implies moving people from tiny huts in shithole villages into modern apartment buildings.
somewhat wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/01/08/wbr.kim.jong.il/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... randy.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 00388.html
Also: apparently Madeleine Albright from he 90's visits.
Kirov wrote:
Where in any of these articles does it say that the DPRK is "the world's largest importer of Hennessy cognac"?
OP-Bagration wrote:I don't see why buying Cognac is bad. Kim built an amusement park in Pyongyang, they could have bought ciment instead. Do you want them to live like monks?
Dagoth Ur wrote:DPRK Praise Brigade? Fantastic. DPRK-PB looks nice too.
I guess we should just join you in using the Daily Mail as a source on Korea.
Dagoth Ur wrote:That you used credible and Daily Mail in the same sentence says nothing good. Also I can guarantee that Rodong Sinmun knows more about the DPRK than anyone in the west.
But no post some more silly imperialist propaganda points.