Soviet cogitations: 86
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 24 Feb 2012, 23:00 Ideology: Other Leftist Pioneer
My opinion is i don't agree with the wall or the shootings of the people who tried to cross.
“It is better to die standing than to live on your knees.“-Che Geuvara
Yes i agree with the building of the wall but not the shooting of people who tried to cross over to the west.
I can't justify these shootings to myself.
I would amend the law. Pay back your welfare checks and compensate the state for your education and your child's university education, then you can cross the wall!!@@!!
It's a little old, but we did have a similar poll here a while back:
viewtopic.php?f=123&t=50647 For the record I voted for the wall, but against the shootings.
"Es gibt nichts wiederzuvereinigen" / "There is nothing to (re)unite." - Egon Krenz, last Chairman of the State Council of the German Democratic Republic
Yes i agree with the building of the wall and the shooting of people who tried to cross over to the west.
What was it, 119 deaths total from the Berlin Wall? How many of them were criminals? How many were traitors? I don't really care and it's not like it matters, they're dead and the Wall is gone. But considering that at least a few hundred people have died on the US-Mexico border over just the last couple years effectively overshadows any negativity brought on by the Wall.
Voted in favor of the wall and the shootings in the unique situation that the GDR found itself in. ![]() لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا الله مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ الله - يا عمال العالم اتحدوا Dagoth Ur wrote: Deaths crossing the US-Mexican border annual is about twice the number shot crossing the berlin wall in the entirety of it's existence. Soviet America is Free America!
Under communism, there is no freedom; you are not free to live in poverty, be homeless, to be without an education, to starve, or to be without a job Quote: What does the US border-wall have to do with the E.German one? Besides, these people were shot while trying to get in, while in Berlin it was the opposite. Loz wrote: Actually considering the amount of people that want to build a wall there, it's quite relevant. I guess you can raise the question in response to "if socialism was so great, why did they have to build a wall?" as "if capitalism is so great, why do hundreds die every year fleeing from it in Mexico?" Soviet America is Free America!
Under communism, there is no freedom; you are not free to live in poverty, be homeless, to be without an education, to starve, or to be without a job
Yes but Mexican border guards don't shoot Mexicans trying to get to America.
Loz wrote: THey don't, but the people die nevertheless. Whether they are dying from third and exposure in the Arizona desert or shot by guards doesn't change that they are dying ultimately, due to economic and social conditions. Soviet America is Free America!
Under communism, there is no freedom; you are not free to live in poverty, be homeless, to be without an education, to starve, or to be without a job
Soviet cogitations: 5532
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 04 Aug 2004, 20:49 Embalmed
The second option. It's not like people living in the Warsaw Pact were forced to stay in the same place forever, plus they could travel across the whole bloc with relatively little hindrance.
The wall was of economic importance, stopping a lack of skilled workers, professionals etc. from depriving the rest of society, allowing it to grow quite healthily. It probably also played quite an important role in hindering the FRG from carrying out their bizarre Revanchist aims, like wanting to have half of Poland back. Loz, there is as much state criminality in allowing somebody to die through sheer negligence as there is with the state appointing someone with permission to shoot to kill, in fact, both are highly symbolic acts. Nevertheless, I can only but support GDR policy re: the wall. ![]() "Phil Spector is haunting Europe" -Dr. Karl H. Marx
Yes i agree with the building of the wall but not the shooting of people who tried to cross over to the west. For me the wall was more symbolic than everything else. I learned that the majority of the people who crossed the wall did it for political reasons rather than economic ones, once again showing that the socialist economic system was far from being the main problem.
"If I could control Hollywood, I could control the world." -Joseph Stalin
I voted for the wall and for the shootings. But I don't think the shootings were really a good thing. I mean, the minefields were maybe sufficient. If people managed to get through, then they deserved to live.
![]() "Mao was just a degenerated Trotsky." Dagoth Ur "fishing is part of agriculture" Gred
I'm for the wall but against shooting those who try to cross. Even if there was no one attempting to escape to West Berlin, the wall would serve as a measure of security for any western agents or loonies trying to get into the East.
![]() We have beaten you to the moon, but you have beaten us in sausage making.- Nikita Khrushchev
What is the use of the wall if you are not going to shoot those who cross it. C'mon were not hypocrites here. Everyone of us communists happen to carry that homicidal streak in us. What for did Canadian law state that "Provocation is a valid defence for homicide" if we don't have. By the way, I do not even have the gall to kill an ant.
AlmaAta wrote: Stop trolling. ... With regard to the subject, considering how many East Germans immigrated to the West through other illegal, or even legal methods, the choice to cross the border at the Wall seems like a provocative, symbolic, perhaps even suicidal decision. I don't want to write off an entire group of people who literally risked their lives for a different way of life, but surely some of them had the above mentioned thoughts in their heads for choosing the most heavily fortified and patrolled location to cross. As to the question of shooting or not, without that threat it would be impossible to maintain the Wall and to effectively enforce border control (as far as I'm aware, the threat of being shot exists in every situation where someone is trying to cross from one border to another in a provocative way). It's a difficult moral issue, sure, but so were the very reasons for the Wall in the first place, which literally put the very existence of East Germany at stake. My answer is 'in favor of the Wall and the threat of shooting'. "The thing about capitalism is that it sounds awful on paper and is horrendous in practice. Communism sounds wonderful on paper and when it was put into practice it was done pretty well for what they had to work with." -MiG
It was not intended to troll. For example somebody provokes you in the bus, how would you react if you were terribly humiliated and embarrassed. You feel like beating the pulp out of him, don't you? I think first before I accused you as agent provocateur..Plenty in other websites and forums like these..
Soviet cogitations: 4368
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 20 Jul 2007, 06:59 Ideology: Marxism-Leninism Forum Commissar
Doing what you feel like is probably not a good justification. Whether I feel like beating somebody to a pulp is different from actually beating that person to a pulp. We can understand the action, but that doesn't necessarity justify it.
But let's not get off topic... I don't know enough about this topic to answer. I think that it's a shame that a wall had to be built, not just because that's a tragedy in itself, but because it was such a perfect propaganda tool for the enemy. And shooting people? What a mess...I suppose that it's no use having a rule if you can't uphold it, but, sheesh, what a mess... ![]() "It does not suffice to reject the error; we must overcome it, explain it and outgrow it." - Antonio Labriola Forum Rules soviet78 wrote: That's very true: The traditional, well-known method of defection was to take a vacation to either Hungary or Yugoslavia and then travel towards West Germany. It was sometimes hard to visit Yugoslavia from the DDR, but that's a non-issue: You could travel to another Eastern Bloc country and then to Yugoslavia. Travel between Eastern Bloc countries wasn't very difficult: Eastern bloc tourists didn't always travel to adjacent countries, so crossing from one country you're visiting to visit another wouldn't raise eyebrows. There were rural places in the border that were way less heavily patrolled (and probably easier to climb). Crossing through the goddamn Berlin Wall is an act of deliberate defiance... or desperation. As for the Wall, it sadly needed to be built: Uncontrolled crossings between East Berlin and West Berlin would've allowed all sorts of black market profiteering and Western sabotage/espionage. There probably should have been way fewer restrictions on who could cross and when (after all, being separated from loved ones clearly demoralized some people), but keeping track was essential for national security. Cm'on baby, eat the rich!!! - Motörhead
|
Alternative Display:
Mobile view
|
||||||