Soviet-Empire.com U.S.S.R. and communism historical discussion.
[ Active ]
[ Register ][ Login ]

International Relations to the Communist Movement

POST REPLY
Log-in to remove these advertisements.
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 1519
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 14 Jan 2010, 05:46
Ideology: Other Leftist
Party Member
Post 26 Sep 2011, 00:25
What are the relations of modern China and the international communist movement? Does China still support international revolutionary activity, and does the Chinese Communist Party have any connections with other communist parties?
Image

"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains." - Rosa Luxemburg
Long Live The Bolivarian Revolution!
RIP Muamar Qadafi
RIP Hugo Chavez
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 1446
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 10 Oct 2007, 15:55
Party Member
Post 27 Sep 2011, 17:03
As far as I know China has stopped supporting revolutionary movements since the 1980's. The CCP have very close relations with the Korean Workers Party, if you consider them a communist party.
Image

We have beaten you to the moon, but you have beaten us in sausage making.- Nikita Khrushchev
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 4779
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 12 May 2010, 07:43
Ideology: Other Leftist
Politburo
Post 27 Sep 2011, 17:49
China has ties with Venezuela, Cuba, and North Korea, but I don't know about explicitly supporting revolutionary movements, since that's not really very fashionable nowadays, and the CCP like to avoid being seen culpable in regime changes or trying to force an ideology on other countries explicitly, unlike American mainstream parties that seem to relish in spreading "democracy" and so on.
“Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals” - Mark Twain
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 10596
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 21 Dec 2004, 23:53
Ideology: Marxism-Leninism
Philosophized
Post 27 Sep 2011, 20:28
The various "orthodox" communist parties sometimes send fraternal letters of greeting/solidarity to each other. In states controlled by a CP, a foriegn delegate might attend a party congress (Cuba, Laos, DPRK, Vietnam, China).

Soviet192491 wrote:
As far as I know China has stopped supporting revolutionary movements since the 1980's.


I go further back to the 1960s with Indonesia when the Party stop trying to export revolution.
Image

"Don't hate on me bro" - Loz
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 1446
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 10 Oct 2007, 15:55
Party Member
Post 27 Sep 2011, 22:10
Red Rebel wrote:
I go further back to the 1960s with Indonesia when the Party stop trying to export revolution.

Well I was considering revolutionary movements that they supported to counter Soviet influence. The Mujahideen, UNITA, FNLA, Khmer Rouge.
Image

We have beaten you to the moon, but you have beaten us in sausage making.- Nikita Khrushchev
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 4779
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 12 May 2010, 07:43
Ideology: Other Leftist
Politburo
Post 27 Sep 2011, 22:23
The PRC supported North Vietnam early on during the Vietnam War as well. There are veterans in southeast China, particularly Guangdong Province, who were sent over to Vietnam during that time, and I believe Ho Chi Minh and Mao had good relations. I'm not sure about the exact details, but at some point after Ho's death NVietnam started to turn more toward the Soviets, and then we know what happened after that.

There's an article about Chinese support for North Vietnamese during the war that I found here: http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/20 ... pport.aspx

Some excerpts:

Quote:
The most immediate need was for anti-aircraft artillery, units to counter the overwhelming American air power over North Vietnam. Ho would request Chinese AAA units during a meeting with Mao in May of 1965 and PLA forces would begin flowing into North Vietnam in July of 1965 to help defend the capital of Hanoi and the transportation network to include railroad lines and bridges.[50] This movement of troops from China was not lost on the U.S. as reported in a Top Secret CIA Special Report which identified seven major PLA units in North Vietnam to include the 67th AAA Division, and an estimated 25,000 to 45,000 Chinese combat troops total. [51] Recent Chinese sources indicate that this PLA AAA Division did indeed operate in the western area of North Vietnam. [52] In addition to AAA forces the PLA also provided missiles, artillery and logistics, railroad, engineer and mine sweeping forces. These forces would not only man AAA sites but would also build and repair Vietnamese infrastructure damaged or destroyed by U.S. airstrikes. [53] Such units would have quite a bit of repair work to do given that there would be more than a million tons of bombs dropped by U.S. aircraft upon North Vietnam from 1965 to 1972. [54] The Second Vietnam War would drag on for years as a sort of operational stalemate existed in the skies over North Vietnam. The U.S. could and did bomb the North at will, but the sheer numbers of Chinese forces, to include a total of 16 AAA divisions serving with a peak strength of 170,000 troops attained in 1967, would ensure that a high price would be paid by U.S. pilots with targets often rapidly rebuilt after destruction. [55] Chinese engineering and logistics units would perform impressive feats of construction throughout their stay in North Vietnam effectively keeping the transportation network functioning.

The U.S. Air Campaign over North Vietnam would thus be somewhat of a lost cause, not significantly hurting the communist North enough for Ho and the senior leadership to contemplate ending the insurgency in South Vietnam. Chinese troops in North Vietnam would eventually withdraw, for the most part, by 1970 as the Sino-Vietnamese relationship began to sour over the Paris Peace Talks, and the USSR, among other things. In addition to the AAA umbrella over the North, China would also provide the sinews of modern war that would enable the North Vietnamese Army to undertake modern, large scale offensive operations against South Vietnam in both 1972 and 1975. Chinese trucks, tanks, Surface to air missiles, MIG jet aircraft, 130mm artillery pieces, 130mm mortars, and shoulder fired anti-aircraft missiles, were all moved south. The PAVN had enough first class material to launch a 20 division mechanized Easter Offensive in 1972 into South Vietnam, more divisions than ever commanded by General Patton in Europe during World War II, as one American Officer would point out. [56] The North Vietnamese would pay a terrible price for this gamble, thanks to U.S. airpower and advisors on the ground, losing an estimated 450 tanks and over 100,000 troops killed in action during the 1972 offensive. [57] China would, again, make up for much of the PAVN equipment lost, after the Paris Peace Treaty was signed, in 1973 and 1974, enabling the North Vietnamese to reconstitute units for another offensive in 1975. U.S. forces would not be present this time to help its South Vietnamese allies as 18 well trained and equipped PAVN divisions rolled to Saigon in April of 1975, effectively ending the Second Vietnam War. [58] Both Vietnam Wars, from 1946-1975, ended in victory for North Vietnam against the west, but without the massive amounts of military aid provided by the PRC, most likely the outcome would have been different. As with all what-if’s of history we shall never know.


Quote:
The numbers would be impressive enough, of the military equipment and supplies provided by China. According to Qiang Zhai, during the period 1950-54, the PRC would provide enough weapons, 116,000 small arms and 4630 artillery pieces, to equip some 5 infantry divisions, one heavy engineering and artillery division, one direct fire anti-aircraft artillery regiment and one guards regiment. [61] This infusion of equipment for almost seven divisions worth of troops could not, and would not, be matched by the French. As one U.S. military officer would comment years later “The French politicians continued their irresolute, incoherent, and penny-pinching support of military operations in Indochina, while demanding ‘decisive solutions.’” [62] The numbers would be even more impressive in the Second Vietnam War. Chinese support provided would increase by a factor of ten with arms and equipment from uniforms to tanks to small arms on a yearly basis greater than the entire military aid provided in the early 1950’s against the French. [63] Additionally the Chinese anti-aircraft artillery troops, peaking at a total of 17 divisions and 150,000 men in 1967, would claim credit for downing 1,707 U.S. aircraft over North Vietnam. [64] These Chinese combat troops who were not to be used south of the 21st parallel in North Vietnam; however, the presence of these units secured the North’s rear, turning the nation into the most heavily defended area in the world, and allowing the DRV to use resources in South Vietnam and elsewhere that would have been devoted to homeland defense. [65] In effect the U.S. would not be able to open a second front over the skies of North Vietnam, as it had been able to so successfully over Germany in the Second World War, due to these Chinese divisions.

But the mere presence of China to the north would also be a constant “sword of Damocles” hanging over the heads of Western and South Vietnamese nations. This nearness would also ensure that the ever present possibility of massive, full scale Chinese intervention would always be a factor that had to be considered by Western political and military leaders. Any plans for taking the fight to the North Vietnamese enemy on his home field by going north could not be seriously considered given the clear warnings by the PRC that it would intervene with massive force. The Chinese took great pains to communicate this willingness to fight on behalf of North Vietnam, if seriously threatened, to the United States, communicating warnings via various channels to include ambassadorial talks in Poland, third-party leaders such as the Pakistani and Tanzania Presidents and the British ambassador in Beijing. [66] In some respects this pledge of assistance was just as valuable as the tanks, trucks and guns provided by the PRC.


There's also an article on JStor called "China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69" that was published in the China Quarterly, but I'm not sure how many of you guys can access that. I can, because my tuition money goes toward it...
“Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals” - Mark Twain
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 1519
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 14 Jan 2010, 05:46
Ideology: Other Leftist
Party Member
Post 28 Sep 2011, 00:29
Soviet192491 wrote:
Well I was considering revolutionary movements that they supported to counter Soviet influence. The Mujahideen, UNITA, FNLA, Khmer Rouge.

The UNITA was originally maoist, and China supported maoist organizations in Afghanistan.
Image

"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains." - Rosa Luxemburg
Long Live The Bolivarian Revolution!
RIP Muamar Qadafi
RIP Hugo Chavez
POST REPLY
Log-in to submit your comments and remove Infolinks advertisements.
Alternative Display:
Mobile view
More Historical Forums: The History Forum. Political Forums: The Politics Forum, The UK Politics Forum.
© 2000- Siberian Fox network. Privacy.