So what do you guys think about the pact the Soviets made with the Nazis to carve up Eastern Europe between the two totalitarian regimes? Sounds like a spineless sell out to me.
Even I disagree with the pact but it not like you say. It was a nonaggression pact not a cooperative pact. Then the Nazis attacked even though. Thankfully the union has industrialized to a point to resist and then conquer the Nazis.
![]() لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا الله مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ الله - يا عمال العالم اتحدوا
Soviet cogitations: 3763
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 11 Nov 2009, 07:13 Ideology: Other Leftist Politburo
Stalin knew that Hitler would break the pact, but he made a pact in order to prepare for the invasion, that way russia could properly fight a war against a competitor like Germany.
![]()
No one knew Hitler would break the pact. It was a completely irrational move that opened up a new front in the war and lost it for them. The Soviet Union wanted to dominate Eastern Europe and cosied up with a Hitler to get its way.
Stalin didn't come close to dominating Eastern Europe as a result of the pact. Even the terms of the pact itself were not broad enough to allow it. In fact, Hitler would develop key allies in Eastern Europe.
"I am not the champion of lost causes, but the champion of causes not yet won."-Norman Thomas
Soviet cogitations: 3116
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 12 Jun 2006, 02:14 Ideology: Marxism-Leninism Party Bureaucrat Quote: It was written in Mein Kampf several years before. Germany needed its "vital space" in eastern europe. An attack on the Soviet Union was a matter of time.
Soviet cogitations: 3763
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 11 Nov 2009, 07:13 Ideology: Other Leftist Politburo captainsnow wrote: What you think Hitler's "GrossDeutchland" was just something he said to look tough? Of course he was going to invade Russia, he always was. Hitler pretty much tried the Schlefflin Plan again. ![]()
Soviet cogitations: 4955
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 13 Feb 2008, 15:25 Ideology: Other Leftist Politburo
From what I've been reading, the pact was signed to buy time for the Soviet's. They knew Hitler would invade at some point, but it freed up resources for the Soviet's to deal with the Japanese in the East. That stopped the Empire of Japan from harassing the USSR and arguably played a role in turning their aggression to the Pacific region. It stopped Stalin from having to worry too much about a war being fought on two fronts.
That's true, but the only time Germany and Japan seemed like they were allies was when the Germany declared war on the US since the US declared war on Japan. Anyways I think that Stalin did assume that Hitler would invade, but he thought that it would happen a year later than it did.
Once capitalists know we can release the Kraken, they'll back down and obey our demands for sure.
_Comrade Gulper
Mein Kamf says Hitler wanted to attack Russia.. yeah, and the communist manifesto said the state would no longer exist and living conditions would improve! haha its got nothing to do with what actually would have happened.
yea except the communist manifesto declared the state wouldn't exist in communism, not socialism which the USSR practiced. also living conditions did improve.
also it has everything to do with what happened. mein kampf was a plan of action that the nazis abided to. not to mention, this whole comparison is a logical fallacy. try again. ![]() Quote: Yeah. Of course. The Soviet Union in 1991 was exactly the same shithole as Tsarist Russia in 1917... no wait, it was WORSE, because having multiple parties is of course much better than having adequate food, shelter, free health care and education, and, all in all, a much higher living standard than the majority of the world's population. Is that what you're saying?
Soviet cogitations: 5439
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 28 Sep 2009, 00:56 Ideology: Democratic Socialism Unperson
lol, captainsnow fails again.
On topic, with Allied support, could Stalin's USSR feasibly have defeated Hitler in 1939? Or were the soviets still simply too unprepared?
Soviet cogitations: 1384
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 28 Feb 2009, 03:41 Party Member
depends, does it mean that negociation for the nazi-soviet pact would have failed? or would it be broken right after it was signed? because the ussr negociated for a pact with france and britain which failed.
The schizophrenic is the new jew.
Soviet cogitations: 5439
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 28 Sep 2009, 00:56 Ideology: Democratic Socialism Unperson
Shit. I meant 1940. During the battle of France. I'm talking about what would have happened if Stalin had just said "screw it", and invaded from the east. Did he have the capacity to do so?
I read in Ian Kershaw's Fateful Choices that Gen. Zhukov presented Stalin with a detailed plan to take the Romanian oil fields sometime around 1940 or 41. Stalin, however, dismissed it. So maybe it was possible for the SU to make a strike.
"I am not the champion of lost causes, but the champion of causes not yet won."-Norman Thomas
I remember reading something about Stalin inviting the western allies to invade germany when it was militarizing.
![]()
Yeah, even as early as 1937.
I think he just wanted them to destroy each other.
Once capitalists know we can release the Kraken, they'll back down and obey our demands for sure.
_Comrade Gulper
Soviet cogitations: 1384
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 28 Feb 2009, 03:41 Party Member
and the western world wanted germany and russia to destroy each other.
The schizophrenic is the new jew.
|
Alternative Display:
Mobile view
|
||||||