Soviet-Empire.com U.S.S.R. and communism historical discussion.
[ Active ]
[ Login ]
Log-in to remove these advertisements.

Obama continues terrorist blockade of Cuba

POST REPLY
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 95
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 07 Aug 2009, 17:53
Pioneer
Post 18 Sep 2009, 00:26
PRESIDENT OBAMA MAINTAINS US BLOCKADE OF CUBA
HAVANA, Cuba, Sept 16 (acn) President Barack Obama signed an order extending for another year the law used to impose the US trade blockade on Cuba, despite calls to lift all unilateral economic sanctions against the Caribbean nation.
Granma newspaper reports that Obama has followed in the footsteps of all previous US presidents who have signed one-year extensions of the law since the 1970s. Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush, signed the last extension on September 12, 2008.
“I hereby determine that the continuation for one year of the exercise of those authorities with respect to Cuba is in the national interest of the United States,” Obama said in a statement issued by the White House on Monday, referring to the trade blockade under the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA).
Cuba is the only country in the world subject to sanctions under the Trading with the Enemy Act, enacted in 1917 and which bans trading with countries considered a threat for the United States, currently only affects Cuba.
The one-year extension of the blockade is announced only days before the next meeting of the UN General Assembly, which has condemned – for 17 consecutive years – the US blockade that has cost Cuba more than $90 billion in economic losses.
“We are advocates of the abolition of war, we do not want war; but war can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.” - Mao Tse Tung
[+-]
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 1276
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 28 Feb 2009, 02:54
Ideology: Marxism-Leninism
Party Member
Post 18 Sep 2009, 01:20
I wouldn't say it's "terrorist". Bad? Sure but there's nothing terroristic about it.
Image
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 4953
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 13 Feb 2008, 15:25
Ideology: Other Leftist
Politburo
Post 18 Sep 2009, 01:38
It's supposed to put terror into the minds of the Cuban government......
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 95
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 07 Aug 2009, 17:53
Pioneer
Post 18 Sep 2009, 01:40
Quote:
I wouldn't say it's "terrorist". Bad? Sure but there's nothing terroristic about it.


You're totally wrong.

The reason the Embargo of Cuba was implemented was to starve Cuban civilians to death. USA wanted to starve so many Cubans by the Embargo that the people would eventually revolt against the Government and force it out of Socialism and into Capitalism.
“We are advocates of the abolition of war, we do not want war; but war can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.” - Mao Tse Tung
Soviet cogitations: 56
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 21 Aug 2009, 02:30
Pioneer
Post 18 Sep 2009, 03:36
This embargo is terrorist, state terrorism, even with all the pressure in the world, impossed by the usa the cuban revolution fights on, and so does the proletariat revolution, this is one of the reasons why i think that someone should invade the usa, so it can release their damn pressure over latin america, or perhaps instead of an invasion the european union should embargo them or something, its intolerable
We must march ever forward, creating new ritches and liberating mankind from its chains
Soviet cogitations: 6887
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 30 Nov 2007, 08:37
Unperson
Post 18 Sep 2009, 06:34
Regardless of original intent, at this point it's hardly a terrorist action. Or something surprising for that matter.
banistansig1
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 10737
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 21 Dec 2004, 23:53
Ideology: Marxism-Leninism
Philosophized
Post 18 Sep 2009, 21:24
Link. Same shit, different president.

As for the blockade being terroristic, it could be depending on the definition. It is the use of force on non-combatants in order to create fear (of socialism).
Image

"By what standard of morality can the violence used by a slave to break his chains be considered the same as the violence of a slave master?" - Walter Rodney
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 4764
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 20 Jul 2007, 06:59
Ideology: Marxism-Leninism
Forum Commissar
Post 18 Sep 2009, 21:29
Collective punishment would be more appropriate. It's also a war-crime.
Image

"You say you have no enemies? How is this so? Have you never spoken the truth, never loved justice?" - Santiago Ramón y Cajal
Forum Rules
Soviet cogitations: 6887
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 30 Nov 2007, 08:37
Unperson
Post 19 Sep 2009, 09:33
How's it a war-crime if there is no war?


An besides.... what makes it different from the 10 other presidents before him who continued the blockade?
banistansig1
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 9816
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 19 Apr 2008, 03:25
Embalmed
Post 19 Sep 2009, 16:32
I don't know for some reason I just thought he was gonna try to open relations.
Once capitalists know we can release the Kraken, they'll back down and obey our demands for sure.
_Comrade Gulper
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 9306
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 02 Mar 2004, 15:19
Ideology: Other Leftist
Old Bolshevik
Post 19 Sep 2009, 16:36
Even if he was, I doubt he could change everything overnight.
Image

Fitzy wrote:
Yes, because I am poisoning them. They are my children.
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 9816
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 19 Apr 2008, 03:25
Embalmed
Post 19 Sep 2009, 18:31
True, but ending the embargo would be a good start.
Once capitalists know we can release the Kraken, they'll back down and obey our demands for sure.
_Comrade Gulper
Soviet cogitations: 283
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 29 Apr 2009, 02:31
Unperson
Post 19 Sep 2009, 19:02
Quote:
How's it a war-crime if there is no war?

Seriously, will you piss off with this this trolling? In just about every thread, you pop up in an effort to hijack it, with nothing informative to say.
"Mama, I've sworn to myself not to chase girls until we've knocked off the bourgeoisie in the whole world."---Pavel Korchagin
Soviet cogitations: 7674
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 11 Nov 2004, 02:08
Embalmed
Post 19 Sep 2009, 19:33
Quote:
Seriously, will you piss off with this this trolling? In just about every thread, you pop up in an effort to hijack it, with nothing informative to say.

Pot called, he says you should call the kettle black.
Soviet cogitations: 3448
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 26 Jun 2006, 15:59
Ideology: Other Leftist
Party Bureaucrat
Post 19 Sep 2009, 19:35
That would be racist, you know, like supporting Mugabe's black opponent would be. . .
The moment one accepts the notion of 'totalitarianism', one is firmly locked within the liberal-democratic horizon. - Slavoj Žižek
Soviet cogitations: 495
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 03 Mar 2008, 02:36
Komsomol
Post 19 Sep 2009, 19:41
Quote:
Seriously, will you piss off with this this trolling? In just about every thread, you pop up in an effort to hijack it, with nothing informative to say.


Kupredu, I think you are just saying this because TRL is Russian. You know that racism is unbecoming to a Marxist-Leninist right?
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 9816
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 19 Apr 2008, 03:25
Embalmed
Post 19 Sep 2009, 20:14
He doesn't troll. Well sometimes he does, but TRL has informative stuff to say most of the time.
Once capitalists know we can release the Kraken, they'll back down and obey our demands for sure.
_Comrade Gulper
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 5137
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 08 Nov 2007, 06:31
Embalmed
Post 19 Sep 2009, 20:29
I thought Kupredu was russian?
Image
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 10737
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 21 Dec 2004, 23:53
Ideology: Marxism-Leninism
Philosophized
Post 20 Sep 2009, 01:57
TRL wrote:
How's it a war-crime if there is no war?


Class war, war of ideas, or the fact that the USA has been trying to destablize the Cuban government for a half of a century.

TRL wrote:
An besides.... what makes it different from the 10 other presidents before him who continued the blockade?


The liberal media, revisionists and some comrades actually believed or inaccurately portrated Obama as someone who could walk on water and transform Cuban-American relations.
Image

"By what standard of morality can the violence used by a slave to break his chains be considered the same as the violence of a slave master?" - Walter Rodney
Soviet cogitations: 6887
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 30 Nov 2007, 08:37
Unperson
Post 20 Sep 2009, 04:43
Sorry I don't really listen to the media in terms of forming my opinions. So for me Obama is just another imperial figurehead.

As for war-crimes, the term is usually associated with a fairly narrow definition. You're using it differently hence why I don't think it's an appropriate term. It's also a term with a lot of political capital attached to it, and it seems to me like you're trying to capitalize on that. If you want to say that the American blockade is evil, then you're right. But the term criminal implies a common set of laws and rules, which can't possibly exist between a socialist Cuba, and imperialist USA.
banistansig1
Alternative Display:
Mobile view
More Forums: The History Forum. The UK Politics Forum.
© 2000- Soviet-Empire.com. Privacy.