It shouldn't come as a complete shock to anyone, that Chairman Mao considered capitalist restoration a distinct possibility. After all his entire anti-revisionist and GPCR campaign was premised on the theory of capitalist restoration in the USSR and its possible repetition in China.
What is interesting is the specific economic structure of Socialist China, that he claimed would allow a rapid change in system, with a mere change of leadership at the top. Quote: https://www.marxists.org/reference/arch ... 01/x01.htm Regardless of the historical views of Lin Biao, at the time of this writing he was used as a stand-in for the rightwing of the CPC as represented by Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping. It is remarkable that to some extent Mao is saying that the Dictatorship of the Proletariat carries within itself the seeds of its own demise, at least potentially. The Socialist State cannot eliminate economic inequality and must to a certain extent recognize bourgeois right. But this gradation makes it possible as Mao says for a mere change in leadership to totally change the class-character of a state. This is perhaps a rebuttal to those who argue against the capitalist restoration thesis, that it is too leader-centric. Stalin dies, Khrushchev takes over and suddenly you have capitalism. But if USSR in 1953 and China in 1975 still had substantial economic inequalities due to the inability of the Socialist State to eliminate the commodity mode of production, then said commodity production becomes the very made entry way for any restoration of capitalism. And if you read further on in the article, Zhang argues that even with full knowledge of these dangers it is impossible to eliminate commodity production and unequal wages under the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Kamran Heiss
|
Alternative Display:
Mobile view
|
||||||