Soviet-Empire.com U.S.S.R. and communism historical discussion.
[ Active ]
[ Login ]
Log-in to remove these advertisements.

A sign of change?

POST REPLY
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 3822
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 12 Jun 2006, 02:14
Ideology: Marxism-Leninism
Politburo
Post 05 Dec 2012, 14:36
The new administration in China is pushing for more austere party leaders. Will this change the party's image? Will this have actual impact on the economy and wealth distribution?

Quote:
Beijing bling ban: New China to cut red carpets & luxury living
Published: 05 December, 2012, 13:45

Image


China's Premier Wen Jiabao raises his glass as he makes a toast during the 63rd National Day reception at the Great Hall of the People on September 29, 2012. (AFP Photo/Ed Jones)

China may have overtaken the US as the world’s largest trading partner by taking some pointers from Washington, but the new Chinese government wants to burnish its communist image by banning extravagance, like red carpets and ‘pointless’ speeches.


Image

A luxury car driven by a Chinese official is parked in front of the Great Hall of the People during a session of the National People's Congress at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing (AFP Photo/Stephen Shaver)

Communist Party leaders were notorious for driving around in chauffeured luxury cars, competing with each other on who could build the grandest government offices and even trying to outdo each other with lavish banquets.

Party leaders will no longer be greeted by cheering crowds, red carpets, banners or elaborate flower arrangements, according to an announcement on Chinese state media. China’s new government is taking swift steps to reshape its image amid growing criticism of some politicians’ decadent lifestyles.

The move is a knee-jerk reaction to the media furor dominating Chinese headlines, Dr. Chen Gan of the National University of Singapore explains:

“The new leadership understands that the Communist Party is having an image crisis, because the public, through the development of social media, has cast more and more doubts on the corruptive and lavish lifestyle of the Communist Party cadres,” he said. “They also have witnessed a series of reports by the international media which talk about the scandals and corruptive behaviors related to the Communist Party officials. So this is a form of response to the party’s international critics.”

In April 2012, the Times reported on growing concerns in China that officials’ opulent habits could be costing the country almost $100 billion annually. Many believe the lavish spending is a cover for government officials’ embezzlement of funds – another source of widespread anger and resentment in China.


Image

The luxury official cars park outside the Great Hall of the People near the Tiananmen Gate during a press conference of the National People’s Congress (NPC) Standing Committee in Beijing (AFP Photo/Liu Jin)

China’s new leader, General Secretary Xi Jinping, has vowed to make a crackdown on corruption one of his main agendas. But such a task is easier said than done, according to Steven Tsang of the University of Nottingham:

“The Communist Party of China is not going to eliminate corruption when families of top-level leaders are themselves involved in dealings and accumulation of wealth beyond their normal means,” he said. “So you have a problem here. Unless those are being dealt with you will not be able to deal with corruption completely. But they are ostentatious displays of ill-gotten gains that can be dealt with, and that is what Xi Jinping is dealing with at the moment.”

Also among the new rules is a ban on ‘long and dull’ speeches, as well as self-adoring write-ups in state print media. The guidelines also recommend that officials should no longer attend ribbon-cutting ceremonies, or any other self-aggrandizing events or forums.

Foreign travel will also be “strictly controlled,” which likely means smaller crowds of Chinese students and expats will greet Party leaders traveling abroad.


Image

A crowd of supporters greet the motorcade carrying Chinese President Jintao Hu upon his arrival 18 April 2006 in Seattle, Washington. (Ron Wurzer/Getty Images/AFP)

The new Chinese premier may have been motivated by predecessor Hu Jintao’s final major political report at the Party Congress in November, which lasted for 100 minutes and left many of the delegates nonplussed or sleeping in their seats.

Xi has already given two-stripped down speeches, both without any notes or teleprompters. Other prominent figures, including future Prime Minister Li Keqiang, have reportedly held meetings in which participants were banned from making any showboating speeches.

But Xi’s laid-back attitude towards dress – especially compared to the rigid and buttoned-up demeanor of the party – has left the country wondering how far their new leader will go in reforming the government.

Adam Segal at the Council on Foreign relations told the Atlantic magazine that Xi’s ‘polishing’ of the party would help it regain some control, but that it was still too early to determine if this will ultimately improve public relations.


"Where Argentina goes, Latin America will go".
Leonid Brezhnev

Forum Rules
Loz
[+-]
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 11879
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 06 Dec 2009, 23:17
Philosophized
Post 05 Dec 2012, 16:34
The Chinese Party is filthy rich, some of their bosses have more money than all US Congressmen put together.
Of course, it's tasteless to have such obvious bonvivans openly showing off their wealth, besides most Western politicians ( but none of them is even close to some of the Chinese top brass when it comes to money ) already know this.
Soviet cogitations: 1011
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 24 Feb 2004, 06:15
Party Member
Post 05 Dec 2012, 23:09
It's a nice touch, but by itself it's not enough to make the CPC a real worker's movement.
Back in white
Soviet cogitations: 2407
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 01 Nov 2003, 13:17
Ideology: Other
Forum Commissar
Post 06 Dec 2012, 12:00
It is a wise move. They understand that general living standards will have to rise in order for them to themselves indulge in luxuries. It is possible that they have seen the events in the Middle East as a warning not to create discontent among the masses.
Soviet cogitations: 62
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 01 Aug 2012, 23:54
Pioneer
Post 06 Dec 2012, 14:49
Their new leader seems highly competent.
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 803
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 28 Jan 2008, 19:10
Ideology: Marxism-Leninism
Komsomol
Post 13 May 2013, 18:09
I can't believe, even a Taiwanese Newspaper editorial is calling Xi Jinping out to act on his Communist Ideals.

http://www.chinapost.com.tw/print/378455.htm

Quote:
““The Chinese dream,” Xi was quoted as saying, “is an ideal. Communists should have a higher ideal, and that is communism.”

It appears that Xi also sets his sights on greatness, though greatness of a different kind than that of Martin Luther King Jr., because unlike King, Xi is a communist.

If so, we must then ask what steps he is prepared to take toward achieving some of the communist ideals, such as “from each according to his ability and to each according to his needs” and proletarian dictatorship, instead of dictatorship by the rich and powerful, now that the party is fast becoming the Bourgeois, if not Capitalist, Party of China.

Mr. Xi, what say you begin by bringing into the political bureau some of the “have-nots?””
Kamran Heiss
[+-]
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 38
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 23 Jul 2012, 12:30
Pioneer
Post 30 Jun 2013, 01:21
Communism in China died with Mao Zedong. The Chinese are very good at faking things to save face. All these crackdowns are just to divert people's attention away from the party and make it look like they are actually upholding the most basic ideals of Communism. But they aren't. These so called "Communists" in power are the richest people in the country. That says a lot. Chinese Communist party is just another capitalistic authoritarian regime in red clothing.
[+-]
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 3618
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 22 Oct 2004, 15:15
Ideology: Marxism-Leninism
Politburo
Post 09 Jul 2013, 12:19
This is the kind of cosmetic change that happens all the time. It doesn't affect anyone or anything on a truly large scale. Maybe in a year or so, we'll see how much of this $100 billion (!) has been cut, and then there'll be something noteworthy to talk about.
Alternative Display:
Mobile view
More Forums: The History Forum. The UK Politics Forum.
© 2000- Soviet-Empire.com. Privacy.