Soviet-Empire.com U.S.S.R. forum   Soviet-Empire.com U.S.S.R. forum
Soviet-Empire.com - The U.S.S.R. and communism discussion forum.
[ Register ] [ Login ]
[ Unanswered posts ][ Active topics ]
[ F.A.Q. ]
Moderator: Votes and Polls Forum Mods
  NEW TOPIC     POST REPLY  
Who is the most responsibile for fall of USSR?

  Mikhail Sergei Gorbachev
46% 46% [ 52 ]
 
  Joseph Visaronovich Stalin
17% 17% [ 19 ]
 
  Boris Nikolaevich Yeltsin
20% 20% [ 23 ]
 
  Nikita Sergei Hrushchev
12% 12% [ 14 ]
 
  Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev
4% 4% [ 5 ]
 
Total votes: 113
Who is the most responsibile for fall of USSR?

Pioneer
User avatar
Joined: Sat 03 Feb 2007, 10:44
Posts: 171
Location: SFR Jugoslavija Ideology:Humanism
PostPosted: Tue 13 Feb 2007, 15:49
Yes it`s he whose name we don`t pronounce. You could have come to Croatia to the hotel in some village (I can`t remember exactly where) to show him some "thankfulness". But I bet the road was blocked by the CIA.
Image
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Tue 13 Feb 2007, 15:56
He is still a friend of Helmut Kohl and comes regularly to Germany where he gets his medical treatment.
 

Party Member
User avatar
Joined: Sat 10 Jun 2006, 23:25
Posts: 1038
Location: Canada Ideology: Cybernetic Socialism
PostPosted: Tue 13 Feb 2007, 20:55
He's not dead, and he still lives in Russia. Check on wikipedia.
Image
Homer: "You guys are commies? Then why am I seeing free markets?"
 

Pioneer
User avatar
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 05:43
Posts: 132
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 11:42
i saw in news few weeks ago, that he is writing famous articles in Russia, he likes to travel, that's why he celebrated his birthday in USA. Russians not really hate him, he was wise man, because he made lot of reforms before the fall of USSR, the only his mistake was to destroy USSR. but he was one of the most wise rulers anyhow.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 11:48
What's going on here? :eek: Can't be right!
Image
 

Pioneer
User avatar
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 05:43
Posts: 132
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 12:05
i don't know if this picture is true, but it can be true, because Gorbachev didn't do anything against Russia, so he can be a friend of Putin.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 12:19
delete
Last edited by Ossi on Wed 14 Feb 2007, 12:22, edited 1 time in total.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 12:20
Him and his german masters.
CIA agent E.Shevarnadze in the back and H.Genscher (front left) responsible for the war in yugoslavia.
Image
Last edited by Ossi on Wed 14 Feb 2007, 12:25, edited 1 time in total.
 

Pioneer
User avatar
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 05:43
Posts: 132
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 12:22
um.. this food looks worth it.why delete?
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 12:27
That timber table represents the USSR and the east bloc. They having a laugh about the way Germany gets most of it.

I deleted the previous link as the picture adress was to long (did not work).
 

Unperson
User avatar
Joined: Sun 16 Jan 2005, 23:15
Posts: 1786
Location: Perma, Banistan Deported for Holocaust Denial
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 13:21
Kruschev for sure.


He screwed over everything after Stalin, or well started paving the way for even bigger screw ups to come during Brezhnev and well, you know the rest.

If I am to blame anyone, I blame Kruschev for turning Soviet to a social-imperialist union.
banistansig2
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Wed 03 Jan 2007, 22:03
Posts: 984
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 16:28
I would generally not blame Khrushchev as the whole cause. Stupid but honest attempts were made during Khrushchev's periods for some reforms. The reforms, however, were generally failures. The problem of just placing it on Khrushchev is illogical as solely blaming one guy would mean that there were huge problems. There weren't huge problems, at least in the early 1950s.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Sat 06 Jan 2007, 22:42
Posts: 865
Location: North America Ideology: Stalinist Absolutism
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 16:39
Quote:
I would generally not blame Khrushchev as the whole cause. Stupid but honest attempts were made during Khrushchev's periods for some reforms. The reforms, however, were generally failures. The problem of just placing it on Khrushchev is illogical as solely blaming one guy would mean that there were huge problems. There weren't huge problems, at least in the early 1950s.


I find absolutely nothing wrong with blaming Khrushchev for the problem. In fact, it's the most logical choice of the aforementioned options. Under Khrushchev, the reforms were more pervasive than simple policy analysis would show. Alongside these reforms, a re-newed sense of property "rights" were established. The housing cooperatives were abandoned and forgotten, and there became a mode of exchange based upon simple market schemes absent a monetary system. It didn't become clearly obvious until later, but by the 70's Soviet citizens had a clear understanding of a new sense of "property."
Image
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Wed 03 Jan 2007, 22:03
Posts: 984
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 16:47
I would agree to your assertion, which is expanded upon in Bill Bland's The Restoration of Capitalism in the Soviet Union. I just wouldn't agree on the idea that simply blaming the problems on Khrushchev is correct since there was no "absolute ruler" of the USSR. It lacks a realistic analysis of the USSR and just puts all the blame on one man.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Sat 06 Jan 2007, 22:42
Posts: 865
Location: North America Ideology: Stalinist Absolutism
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 16:53
Quote:
I would agree to your assertion, which is expanded upon in Bill Bland's The Restoration of Capitalism in the Soviet Union. I just wouldn't agree on the idea that simply blaming the problems on Khrushchev is correct since there was no "absolute ruler" of the USSR. It lacks a realistic analysis of the USSR and just puts all the blame on one man.


I agree completely- that blaming the whole thing on Khrushchev is premature and lacks thorough analysis...but we're discussing within the parameters of this thread, if you want to get into a detailed discussion on the causes of the fall of the Soviet Union that would be another topic. But yes, I agree that you can't JUST blame it on one man.
Image
 

Unperson
User avatar
Joined: Sun 16 Jan 2005, 23:15
Posts: 1786
Location: Perma, Banistan Deported for Holocaust Denial
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 16:59
Quote:
If I am to blame anyone, I blame Kruschev for turning Soviet to a social-imperialist union
banistansig2
 

Pioneer
User avatar
Joined: Sat 03 Feb 2007, 10:44
Posts: 171
Location: SFR Jugoslavija Ideology:Humanism
PostPosted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 18:31
hugas:
Quote:
He's not dead, and he still lives in Russia. Check on wikipedia.


Quote:
i saw in news few weeks ago, that he is writing famous articles in Russia, he likes to travel, that's why he celebrated his birthday in USA. Russians not really hate him, he was wise man, because he made lot of reforms before the fall of USSR, the only his mistake was to destroy USSR. but he was one of the most wise rulers anyhow.


If its something about a CIA agent. I wouldn`t trust any news, papers, any media at all. I don`t know if I`d trust my bare eyes.
He celebrated his bithday in Croatia. I`m certain about that.
You need to know that all media servers interests of the state and the mighty burgeoise, every information goes throught the goverment before going public. So you hear only those thing that they want you to hear and in a way they want you to hear it. That`s how people are controlled in this "democracy".

Quote:
he was wise man, because he made lot of reforms before the fall of USSR, the only his mistake was to destroy USSR


No comment.

Quote:
Him and his german masters.
CIA agent E.Shevarnadze in the back and H.Genscher (front left) responsible for the war in yugoslavia.



I`ve always known that CIA was responsible for that war(1991-1995).
But I had no idea about those agents or that pictiure you posted.
Could you explain me that better?
Maybe you could post it in Other states-Tell me about Yugoslavia theme.
Image
Last edited by Red_Walker on Tue 20 Feb 2007, 13:16, edited 1 time in total.
 

Pioneer
User avatar
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 05:43
Posts: 132
PostPosted: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 08:43
you want to say that media lies that he lives in Russia and writing articles there? :hmm:
 

Komsomol
Joined: Sat 24 Dec 2005, 15:28
Posts: 366
Location: Russia
PostPosted: Sat 24 Feb 2007, 07:38
Most? Gorbachev...

It's also not entirely a question of "who", but of "what"... Events, circumstances... many of them...

But still, Gorbachev - the system was destroyed from above.
 

Embalmed
User avatar
Joined: Tue 21 Dec 2004, 15:53
Posts: 9651
Location: Penn State Ideology: Revolutionary Humanism
PostPosted: Sat 24 Feb 2007, 11:37
As Fidel Castro said, blaming a person for everything would be historical simplism. He was talking about Stalin but I do not see the fall of the USSR caused by anyone person.
Image
"In the absence of any pictures, I conveniently assume that people on this forum look like the faces on their avatars (if the avatars have people on them)" - Marshal Konev
 
  NEW TOPIC     POST REPLY   You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
More Forums: The Politics Forum, The UK Politics Forum, The History Forum.
[ Top ]
© 2000- Siberian Fox network. Powered by phpBB