Soviet-Empire.com U.S.S.R. forum   Soviet-Empire.com U.S.S.R. forum
Soviet-Empire.com - The U.S.S.R. and communism discussion forum.
[ Register ] [ Login ]
[ Unanswered posts ][ Active topics ]
[ F.A.Q. ]
Moderator: Votes and Polls Forum Mods
  NEW TOPIC     POST REPLY  
Who is the most responsibile for fall of USSR?

  Mikhail Sergei Gorbachev
46% 46% [ 52 ]
 
  Joseph Visaronovich Stalin
17% 17% [ 19 ]
 
  Boris Nikolaevich Yeltsin
20% 20% [ 23 ]
 
  Nikita Sergei Hrushchev
12% 12% [ 14 ]
 
  Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev
4% 4% [ 5 ]
 
Total votes: 113
Who is the most responsibile for fall of USSR?

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 16:21
Well, one way or the other the damage is done. >:
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Wed 03 Jan 2007, 22:03
Posts: 984
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 16:37
Quote:
I blame Gorbacev, he allowed Yelzin to rise in the first place. Remember that humiliating act in the duma? Gorbacev should have
thrown those sheets of paper back at Yelzin and give him a good beating. But he was to much of a p***y or on the payrole of Langley, Virginia.


You mean the picture where they are arguiing with each other?

I put the blame more on Yeltsin because he delivered the final blow. Another point of view is that if a regular coup were crushed by a person other than the country's leader, than the country's leader is screwed most of the time, no matter what the country's leader policies were. Gorbachev simply set the stage for Yeltsin to gain power.
Last edited by Richthofen on Sun 11 Feb 2007, 16:49, edited 2 times in total.
 

Central Committee
User avatar
Joined: Thu 06 Jul 2006, 20:49
Posts: 2896
Location: Osaka, Japan
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 16:45
Quote:
Who was Wang Jingwai?


Wang Jingwei was a Chinese member of the Kuomintang who collaberated with the Imperial Japanese.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_Jingwei
Image

"They bizarrely take pride in the absense of AIDS from the country."
-- Harry Salmon, DPRK Critic.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 16:46
Richthofen,

The duma scene were Yelzin walks up to Gorbacev and gives him those sheets of paper to sign the dissolution of the USSR.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Wed 03 Jan 2007, 22:03
Posts: 984
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 16:49
Is there a video of that somewhere? I want to see it to get a good laugh.
 

Embalmed
Joined: Wed 10 Nov 2004, 18:08
Posts: 6741
Location: Canada Ideaology:Marxism
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 16:56
they all contributed to it in some way shape or form.
With over industrializiation
Cults of personality
economic reforms
lack of economic reforms
failure to act at key times


Hell I could go on but nobody on that list has a clean slate in the fall of the USSR. They were all nails in the coffin somehow, some way.
Image
Oblisk on Jeans wrote:
Jeans are an icon of America, and that reason alone should be enough for socialists and communists to not wear it.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:06
Richthofen, I will try to find it on the net.

In the mean time here is some other Duma action:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZGaaqH2o6I
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Wed 03 Jan 2007, 22:03
Posts: 984
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:10
Wow, that was as bad as a meeting in the Taiwanese Parliament(food fights anyone)?

But generally speaking, Eastern Europeans scare me with their shouting.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:18
Are you referring to Red_Walker? :lol:
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Wed 03 Jan 2007, 22:03
Posts: 984
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:19
No, I'm referring to a few I've met in real life and seen on TV. It's really scary. Eastern Europeans are generally intimidating if they're big. And they shout at times. It's scary and intimidating.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:25
Can't say that about the women they are certainly one of the most beautiful. But you right some lack the manners! I once went to Moscow and used the metro over there. People just ran into me, hit me with their elbows and stepped on my foot a thousand times and none apologised once.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Wed 03 Jan 2007, 22:03
Posts: 984
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:28
You should try going to busy parts of China. It's a good thing they're generally short. Because you have to push to go anywhere in a lineup.
Last edited by Richthofen on Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:35, edited 1 time in total.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:34
My brother was in Tokyo recently and told me about the metro over there. There are guys employed on the stations that push the people into the trains with some kind of shovel before the door closes.
 

Unperson
Joined: Sat 18 Nov 2006, 13:54
Posts: 436
Location: Perma, Banistan Deported For Anti-Semitism
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:43
Yeltsin's counter-coup. Those that cite Gorbachev are rather ignorant because in the end he worked to try and preserve the USSR. 76% of the Soviet people approved of his desires in the March 1991 referendum. It was Yeltsin who deposed the State Emergency Committee and proceeded to unconstitiounally dissolve the USSR with his cronies in December 1991.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:47
Trying to excuse Gorbacev? All this Perstroika and Glasnost non-sense was designed to end up with Yelsin.
 

Unperson
Joined: Sat 18 Nov 2006, 13:54
Posts: 436
Location: Perma, Banistan Deported For Anti-Semitism
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:50
Quote:
Trying to excuse Gorbacev?


Not at all. It was not his intention to destroy the USSR whereas that was the intention Yeltsin had all along. Still, it were Gorbachev's atrocious economic policies which caused a severe crisis which paved way for Yeltsin to seize power:

1990 Collier's Yearbook:
For months the government seemed unable or unwilling to deal with the economic crisis that was the main concern of every Soviet citizen. Some essential consumer goods, such as sugar, were rationed; others, such as bread and potatoes—staples of the Soviet diet— suffered shortages. There were spot shortages, too, of many manufactured products, not least among them cigarettes, to the open disgruntlement of Soviet smokers, who staged several demonstrations in Moscow. With the approach of winter, food shortage approached proportions not seen since World War II, and hoarding became commonplace. The government had dismantled the central planning system that had managed the economy for some 60 years but had provided nothing to replace it.

But as a whole, the dissolution of the USSR was a coup d'tat pulled off by Yeltsin and his cronies when they illegally signed the CIS agreements.
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Sat 06 Jan 2007, 22:42
Posts: 865
Location: North America Ideology: Stalinist Absolutism
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:52
Nikita Khrushchev was ultimately responsible. If not for his policies of de-Stalinization, liberalization of both the state apparatus and the economy, then the problems of the 80's never would've existed-- paving the way for Gorbachev and Yeltsin. The moment of truth lied with Khrushchev, Gorbachev's just happened to be at the top when the entire thing finally crumbled. It had been a long, drawn out, arduous process, not an instantaneous result of one man's (Gorbachev) desire to liberalize, it had to start somewhere.
Image
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Wed 03 Jan 2007, 22:03
Posts: 984
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:54
Though it ca be viewed as starting with Khrushchev, on what basis would it be to blame everything on one man?
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Fri 19 Jan 2007, 11:29
Posts: 652
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:58
Alles Klar! Keep blaming Nikita for it. :roll:
 

Komsomol
User avatar
Joined: Sat 06 Jan 2007, 22:42
Posts: 865
Location: North America Ideology: Stalinist Absolutism
PostPosted: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 17:59
I don't blame any one man, but the realm of this poll dealt with pinning the responsibility on one of the aforementioned choices, and its on that basis that I posited my response.

The trend started with Khrushchev, therefore, I hold him the most responsible. Had Khrushchev been ousted by Molotov, Malenkov, Kaganovich, and Bulganin, it would've at least postponed any source of revisionism for at least another 30 years, thus there would probably still be a Soviet Union.
Image
 
  NEW TOPIC     POST REPLY   You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
More Forums: The Politics Forum, The UK Politics Forum, The History Forum.
[ Top ]
© 2000- Siberian Fox network. Powered by phpBB