Soviet-Empire.com U.S.S.R. and communism historical discussion.
[ Active ]
[ Login ]
Log-in to remove these advertisements.

Birth control?

POST REPLY

Should there be a birth control?

Poll ended at 22 Jun 2004, 07:41

Yes
15
94%
No
1
6%
 
Total votes : 16
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 53
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 08 May 2004, 04:04
Pioneer
Post 15 Jun 2004, 07:41
I think there should be a birth control on third world coutries.India for instance has no birth control,look at them on how backwards they are.Religion can really ruin man.The church doesnt want to do anything!!They say it's evil!
The goal of socialism is communism- Lenin

How do you tell a capitalist?Well,it's someone who reads Smith and Ricardo.And how do you tell an anti-Capitalist?It's someone who understands Smith and Ricardo. -Communists
[+-]
Soviet cogitations: 1515
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 03 Apr 2004, 12:16
Party Member
Post 15 Jun 2004, 07:44
I DONT REALLY CARE
Image


one of the finest (and on going) motorbikes in russian history.
<- not a ural but a dnepr
Soviet cogitations: 1215
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 04 Aug 2004, 16:42
Party Member
Post 15 Jun 2004, 08:21
let them have children, you cant controll that.
China pays the citizens that have just one children but there is not a real birth control, just benefits to the people that has just one kid.
Image
Soviet cogitations: 1526
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 24 Jan 2004, 10:30
Party Member
Post 15 Jun 2004, 10:05
it depends. if there is overpopulation, yes, there should be.
Image
Soviet cogitations: 1011
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 24 Feb 2004, 06:15
Party Member
Post 15 Jun 2004, 14:31
Contraceptives should OBVIOUSLY be legal.
Back in white
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 9306
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 02 Mar 2004, 15:19
Ideology: Other Leftist
Old Bolshevik
Post 15 Jun 2004, 15:07
Foolishness, do you think India is backwards and religious because of too many births? Do you have no understanding of any kind of analysis of society, let alone marxist?
Image

Fitzy wrote:
Yes, because I am poisoning them. They are my children.
Soviet cogitations: 687
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 27 May 2004, 03:40
Komsomol
Post 15 Jun 2004, 16:44
the smaller the population the easeier it is for the government to provide all the people with things
The revolucion will come to amerika and i will be there awaiting it
Image

There is a little bit of Che in all of us
-reh reh , red revolucion
FREE MUMIA
Soviet cogitations: 844
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 22 Jun 2004, 21:01
Komsomol
Post 15 Jun 2004, 17:37
I’m not sure that birth control is really to realistic of a proposition, many countries have high birth rates because religion compels them to do so. Red Revelucion made a valid point about why it may be beneficial to keep it under control. Also, since there seems to be so much worrying about the environment and resources, to high of a population could be dangerous. I would have to say no to birth control unless complications arising from overpopulation are truly imminent.
Soviet cogitations: 1011
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 24 Feb 2004, 06:15
Party Member
Post 15 Jun 2004, 17:56
Quote:
the smaller the population the easeier it is for the government to provide all the people with things



You realize that the people are the productive force of society, do you?

That being said, it is true that there is no point (except from a capitalist point of view, of having workforce in excess) in keeping a humongous population, and that making the people be concienciated about the fate of their sons, and about the use of contraceptives, should be a must for socialist goverments in overpopulated areas.
Back in white
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 2538
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 26 Feb 2004, 06:10
Party Bureaucrat
Post 15 Jun 2004, 19:45
I will never in a million years be able to BEGIN to comprehend how any sane, logical, or rational perrson can want to PREVENT there from being birth control. That really just seems like a steaming pile of reactionary Catholic rhetoric to me.
I don't mean to bash anyone who WANTS to prevent birth control.....but in all sincere honesty......I think these people are not only just plain stupid....but get off on the knowledge that they can have power over others by preventing birth control from being available to the public.
Image

Goranhammer... blessed be his name. May his memory live in our hearts and touch our souls like a strawberry tampon enema
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 9306
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 02 Mar 2004, 15:19
Ideology: Other Leftist
Old Bolshevik
Post 15 Jun 2004, 19:47
I can understand your confusion laibach, this was a poorly phrased poll. but he means controlling the number of births. (like in China 1 child per family policy.)
Image

Fitzy wrote:
Yes, because I am poisoning them. They are my children.
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 2538
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 26 Feb 2004, 06:10
Party Bureaucrat
Post 15 Jun 2004, 20:08
OH! hahahhaha.........


wow, I'm an idiot. My apologies.....


in that case, I would have to say ONLY and ONLY IF.....there is a problem with overpopulation.




sorry about that.
Image

Goranhammer... blessed be his name. May his memory live in our hearts and touch our souls like a strawberry tampon enema
Soviet cogitations: 404
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 02 Jun 2004, 19:56
Komsomol
Post 20 Jun 2004, 17:33
Wow, I got it wrong too laibach, lol.
At first it confused me becouse I wonderd who the hell wouldent want birthcontrol besides crazy ass religous nutcases.
But there shouldent be birth control, unless there is A : Famine B : Overpopulation, or C : there is a crazy ass dictator in charge who wants a heir, and wants one from the people.
Sorry had to have a C in there or it would annoy me. . .
Your my new Kommie Komrade, Komrade
Alternative Display:
Mobile view
More Forums: The History Forum. The UK Politics Forum.
© 2000- Soviet-Empire.com. Privacy.