CPUSA and Vietnam - Soviet-Empire.com U.S.S.R.

MagillaGuerrilla

[+-]

Soviet cogitations: 814
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 19 Dec 2005, 16:51
Komsomol

04 Jan 2007, 22:56

EDIT: Ah crap, didn't realize how old this thread was. Nevermind.

Com Viet

[+-]

Soviet cogitations: 311
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 12 Dec 2004, 02:21
Komsomol

12 Jan 2007, 20:41

"SOCIALISM is public ownership" - That's RIGHT. But what is taking place here in Vietnam is not socialism, and in fact, a true socialist society hasn't existed in the world. Vietnam is on its 'Transitional Period Towards Socialism', which was considered in 1986, as 'a period to develope the material and technical foundation for Socialism in the future'.

Ezekiel39

[+-]

Soviet cogitations: 857
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 30 Nov 2006, 09:01
Komsomol

24 Feb 2007, 08:01

That's kinda funny. It's gone from collective ownership, to selling to foriegn imperialists, to calling selling the coutnry to imperialists 'transition so socialism.'
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

But anywho, the foreign investment has not done much to develop the infrastructure, but to manufacture garments and electronics for consumption in imperialist countries. And to rob the natural resources instead of using them to help the vietnamese people.

"Read some of the works of Marx and Engels... couple this with a reading of the Bible and note the parallelism of Communism and the program of Satan." Thomas O. Kay, National Association of Evengelicals

de_la_Rocha

[+-]

Soviet cogitations: 26
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 26 Jan 2007, 04:31
Pioneer

24 Feb 2007, 23:21

Didn't the vietnameese take up the communist name as a means to an independent country?

As different as we have been taught to look at each other by colonial society, we are in the same struggle and until we realize that, we'll be fighting for scraps from the table of a system that has kept us subservient instead of being self-determined.

Red Rebel

[+-]

Soviet cogitations: 10743
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 21 Dec 2004, 23:53
Ideology: Marxism-Leninism
Philosophized

25 Feb 2007, 03:23

Yeah, pretty much.

"By what standard of morality can the violence used by a slave to break his chains be considered the same as the violence of a slave master?" - Walter Rodney