Soviet-Empire.com U.S.S.R. and communism historical discussion.
[ Active ]
[ Register ][ Login ]

How Important was the Lend-Lease Program

POST REPLY
Log-in to remove these advertisements.
Soviet cogitations: 1445
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 24 Mar 2003, 19:17
Unperson
Post 14 Jul 2004, 19:50
Sorry guys, I was busy.

Quote:
Heres some proff about the Soviet Union giving Nazi Germany Grain, right before the Great Patriotic War.

http://www.onwar.com/chrono/1939/oct39/24oct39.htm



They write:

Quote:
In Moscow... A Soviet-German trade agreement is signed. The USSR agrees to supply 1 million tonnes of grain and fodder to Germany. Meanwhile, the Finnish delegation leaves to consult with their government on new proposals put forward by the Soviet government, concerning boundary revisions.


And? Any proof? Reference? Names? Documents?

HOW DO YOU SUPPOSE I NEED TO DISPROVE SOMETHING THAT HAS NO REFERENCE IN IT???

How is it different from "Elvis is found in Siberia"?

Same stuff.
Soviet cogitations: 544
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 14 Jun 2004, 00:08
Komsomol
Post 15 Jul 2004, 22:16
Okay some more websites then:

http://www.o5m6.de/sources.html

http://www.ww2pacific.com/lendlease.html

All though not important in 1943, the lend-lease program did help the Soviet Union tremendously in the early years, you can't deny this Chernobog. If the lend-lease program wasn't important why is it on the day of the invasion (or month, I forget) that Stalin was yelling out for help from Great Britain and the US?

[SF edit: Edited for readability]
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 1338
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 04 Jan 2003, 15:32
Ideology: None
Webmaster
Post 16 Jul 2004, 18:41
When Chernobog-13M is asking for sources he wants to know where exactly you found the specific points that you make. For example, where does it say that on the 22nd June, 1941 (the date of the German invasion) that Stalin "was yelling out for help from Great Britain and the US"?

The very nature of the lanuage you use ("Yelling out") suggests that you have already distorted the facts. In any event, Britain was already at war with Germany, and if the USA was already helping the UK with equipment then why not ask?

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Image
Soviet cogitations: 544
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 14 Jun 2004, 00:08
Komsomol
Post 17 Jul 2004, 09:17
k that still dosen't get to the hole point of this that the lend-lease program was indeed important for the USSR, in the ealiy stages of the War.
Last edited by =SoViEt= on 17 Jul 2004, 22:33, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Soviet cogitations: 1338
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 04 Jan 2003, 15:32
Ideology: None
Webmaster
Post 17 Jul 2004, 18:10
[Off topic: =SoViEt=, will you please type properly or I am just going to delete your posts. One doesn't have to be a genius to paste their text into MS word and check it before posting.]
Last edited by Siberian Fox on 18 Jul 2004, 22:00, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Soviet cogitations: 204
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 24 Mar 2004, 03:27
Pioneer
Post 17 Jul 2004, 20:15
The Lend-Lease program obviously had its advantages for all the allies, but it mainly supported Britain and the Soviet Union basically got all the leftovers, which didn't matter much.
"While the state exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom, there will be no state." - Vladimir Lenin
In Soviet Russia, TV watches you!
Soviet cogitations: 544
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 14 Jun 2004, 00:08
Komsomol
Post 18 Jul 2004, 00:06
First sorry Siberian Fox, i usally look over my posts later to correct them, if there is anything to be corrected.

Second the Lend-Lease program had alot of advantages for the Soviet Union, like did you know enoff food was sent to the Soviet Union to feed the Red Army, for 5 years, this was indeed important because most of the food producing areas of the Soviet Union where under German control, also the Soviets got plenty of other eqieqment important to the War effort, with out this eqieqment the Soviet Union would have to produce them its self taking production off of tanks,guns,etc.
Soviet cogitations: 1583
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 27 Jul 2004, 07:46
Unperson
Post 27 Jul 2004, 08:37
Lend-Lease aid didn't really pick up until well after Soviet industrial production was set up beyond the Urals and got into high gear....so overall, aside from drawing U-boats away from the much more vital USA/Canada-Britain routes, Lend-Lease didn't have much effect on the eventual outcome of the war. It's greatest impact was providing the Soviet Union with competitive fighters at a time when there modern fightercraft were scarce along the frontlines for the Red Air Force.
[+-]
Soviet cogitations: 301
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 25 Jul 2004, 20:17
Komsomol
Post 27 Jul 2004, 08:40
After the end of the war, the US requested that all of their equipment be returned to them. Stalin and the other Soviet leadership put up a fight about this. In the end, the equipment that was returned, was destroyed right in front of the soilders who had used it.
“This is not what we fought for (Poverty). We dreamt of how rich life would be after the war” - Nikolai Protasov, Great Patriotic War Veteran
Image
Soviet cogitations: 544
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 14 Jun 2004, 00:08
Komsomol
Post 27 Jul 2004, 09:56
Czechman and Cloutierfan can you provide links that proff that The Lend-Lease program was not important, and that the equipment was returned to the US, i thought the Soviet had to pay for the equipment that is that first time ever hearing about it, and clouterifan i already explained how the lend-lease program was important to the USSR would you take the time to read the posts in the subject and read the links, rather then just going on stating something.
Soviet cogitations: 1583
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 27 Jul 2004, 07:46
Unperson
Post 27 Jul 2004, 10:14
I have read the entire thread, =soviet=, and it's mostly just mindless flaming/trolling by you and another poster. I saw it necessary to get the thread back on track. You were just continually rambling about how Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia exchanged goods before the war. You made no mention of aircraft, as I did.
[+-]
Soviet cogitations: 301
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 25 Jul 2004, 20:17
Komsomol
Post 27 Jul 2004, 10:22
I will look for the link where I found it. But that does not mean, that I will find it. Why do we not ask Chern about this in the mean time. If I find the link, I will post it.
“This is not what we fought for (Poverty). We dreamt of how rich life would be after the war” - Nikolai Protasov, Great Patriotic War Veteran
Image
Soviet cogitations: 544
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 14 Jun 2004, 00:08
Komsomol
Post 27 Jul 2004, 10:56
i think Chern is gone never answeard these posts in ever?

Quote= Lend-Lease didn't have much effect on the eventual outcome of the war. It's greatest impact was providing the Soviet Union with competitive fighters at a time when there modern fightercraft were scarce along the frontlines for the Red Air Force.

- How is that a refernce, all you say is they they gave them fighters you din't say how many, you never said the names of the fighters, and i made no mention of aircraft because the Soviet Union had there own creat aircraft and lots of them.
Soviet cogitations: 1583
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 27 Jul 2004, 07:46
Unperson
Post 27 Jul 2004, 11:05
You want me to post sources? OK, but it's not a web site, it's a book.

"The Russians received almost 5,000 P-39s as lend-lease aid from the U.S." - pp 139

"With the June date for Bagration nearing, and with Soviet factories now producing nearly 3,300 planes a month, air commanders now had at their disposal 13,428 mostly modern machines, including 8,798 combat aircraft assigned to frontline armies. Also appearing on the awesome inventory were 10,862 planes of American design and manufacture, shipped at much sacrifice to the Soviet Union as part of the lend-lease program begun in 1941." - pp 151

The Soviet Air Force at War
Time-Life Books, 1983
Russell Miller

If you really so care as to dispute my sources, go to your local public library. This series of books are remarkably common throughout the western world.

Edited for typos.
Soviet cogitations: 544
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 14 Jun 2004, 00:08
Komsomol
Post 27 Jul 2004, 11:14
i never said that the american lend-lease was not important i just wanted to c links that can "prove" what you say. I Have no doupt that America sent some good plains there, but they sent way more importaner things like boots,food,radios,etc abone etc.
Soviet cogitations: 204
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 24 Mar 2004, 03:27
Pioneer
Post 27 Jul 2004, 19:02
The only things I've ever heard contributed to the Soviets in the Lend-Lease program were some aircraft and an assortment of armored vehicles. By the time the Lend-Lease program was at its hieght for them, Soviet production was already up to speed and possibly the fast production of any country in the war.
"While the state exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom, there will be no state." - Vladimir Lenin
In Soviet Russia, TV watches you!
Soviet cogitations: 544
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 14 Jun 2004, 00:08
Komsomol
Post 28 Jul 2004, 20:46
Soviet production was focused on tanks,Aircraft,and Guns, so what the Western Allies sent the Soviet Union was important and did help alot.
[+-]
Soviet cogitations: 301
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 25 Jul 2004, 20:17
Komsomol
Post 28 Jul 2004, 21:12
Quote:
Soviet production was focused on tanks,Aircraft,and Guns, so what the Western Allies sent the Soviet Union was important and did help alot.


This is very true, especially during the first years of the war. Many of the Soviet airplanes that were first built during the first year or so, were built in the US.
“This is not what we fought for (Poverty). We dreamt of how rich life would be after the war” - Nikolai Protasov, Great Patriotic War Veteran
Image
Soviet cogitations: 140
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 24 Aug 2004, 07:00
Pioneer
Post 30 Jul 2004, 07:52
=SoViEt= wrote:
Soviet production was focused on tanks,Aircraft,and Guns, so what the Western Allies sent the Soviet Union was important and did help alot.


What good is obsolete equipment? The Soviets wanted raw materials since American tanks and guns were all obsolete, compared to Soviet tanks. I posted you a link of Soviet tanks before, so you are a troll who spam’s and ignores facts. Trucks were the biggest asset the Soviets received from the Western Allies.
Soviet cogitations: 544
Defected to the U.S.S.R.: 14 Jun 2004, 00:08
Komsomol
Post 02 Aug 2004, 03:59
Yeah trucks where the biggest asset the western allies sent and i know the tanks and Aircraft the western allies sent where pretty usless but that no what iam talking about you know you need more then tanks and planes to win a war.
Last edited by =SoViEt= on 02 Aug 2004, 22:29, edited 1 time in total.
« Previous Page « » Next Page »
POST REPLY
Log-in to submit your comments and remove Infolinks advertisements.
Alternative Display:
Mobile view
More Historical Forums: The History Forum. Political Forums: The Politics Forum, The UK Politics Forum.
© 2000- Siberian Fox network. Privacy.