Love

I never had a problem with love... I'm still together with my first girlfriend, for two years now and I love her every day more and more... I'm happy!

I'm resigned to being cold hearted and alone after it turned out the guy i was in love with wasnt gay…………so dissapointing.

i too know what it is like to have a love that is not returned.....

oooh who dosen't? theres lots of fishies in the sea ^_^ No worries, Mr. T Fox

At the moment im quite enjoying being cold hearted, but that wont last, but there arent any attractive made fish in the sea around me at the moment, oh well, guess i'll have a look at the female population.

As bourgeois and Cliché as unrequited Love sounds (and Im sure there are a lot of people reading this thread thinking "Oh god, bloody bourgeois romantics ) its more often the case than they'd think. (God, I know all about that.... )

By the way, who voted that love is nothing more than lust?

Quote:

(and Im sure there are a lot of people reading this thread thinking "Oh god, bloody bourgeois romantics )

Why the hell i would think that? Love is for all people, no matter where they are how they look or what they do. Politics has nothing to do with it either

I believe love is necessary for the family unit to exist, however, I believe that eventually, the family unit will dissolve. Under Socialism, the state will take on the rearing of children, making family outdated, and unnecessary. Without families, love too will become unnecessary. Why limit ourselves to one partner? Society makes us feel bad if we "cheat," but in reality, if the state takes on the responsibility of the children, there is no reason to fall in love. Therefore, I came to the obvious conclusion: Love is bourgeois, and we DON'T need it!

-Dan

Oke man

Whoever says we don't need love hasn't ever been in love, lol.


>_< if you were in my place...Mr. QSP....YOU WOULD DEFINATELY THINK DIFFERENTLY.


Love is all we need, always.... I mean, I guess I am a little bias towards it because I'm very, very in love right now....but what would the world be like without it? I hate to think

Honestly I don't think I could ever love more than one woman at once. Either way it's been proven quite difficult to achieve these kind of relationships which have been attempted at communes that were into sexual liberation and whatnot.

I'm in love right now... Don't think he knows it though... he's a bit old for me, but he's like a knight... So romantic..So handsome...*Sigh*...

But older guys are the best as long as they're not all pedopheliatic and stuff....You're knight will come to you, I'm sure ^_^

the only people who are pedohiles are ones who go on ninemsn chat. in your case microsoft chat. msn is ok cos you know who's email it is.

It's not a gene. The average pedophile, was also originally molested himself. It's an evil cycle.

Quote:

I believe love is necessary for the family unit to exist, however, I believe that eventually, the family unit will dissolve. Under Socialism, the state will take on the rearing of children, making family outdated, and unnecessary. Without families, love too will become unnecessary. Why limit ourselves to one partner? Society makes us feel bad if we "cheat," but in reality, if the state takes on the responsibility of the children, there is no reason to fall in love. Therefore, I came to the obvious conclusion: Love is bourgeois, and we DON'T need it!

I totaly agree, of course, I've never been 'in love'. I figure that I'll feel my first dopamein and other pleaseing brain chemical euphoria will come when I meet a suitable mate and others will call it 'love' and I will feel like I'm on top of the world. So I soppose that I do belive in 'love', just not in its traditional manner.